A Brave New Singapore: Cloning Humans in Animals

Is the recent attempt of creating cybrids a leap of progress or a technological trespass?

By now we already know that human cybrids are embryos fabricated with enucleated animal eggs and the nucleus of a human body cell. These embryos will be terminated when their harvest of embryonic stem cells are removed for the sole purpose of research on the said cells. We also know that Singapore scientists want to make human cybrids and that the Bioethics Advisory Commission (BAC) is seeking a response from the Singaporean public to know what is their opinion on this issue.

Two things strike me about this matter, Read the rest of this entry »

Cybrids, Unethical Experimentation on Quasi-human Subjects (8)

thinker2 There is an obvious difference between experimenting with animals and experimenting on human subjects. For human subjects, we need their informed consent for this experimentation to be licit. There is, however, a debate as to how to go about experimenting on humans when they are incapacitated to give consent. The obvious solution is that the informed consent should be provided by their proxies. But what about those we are not yet born? Can we ethically experiment on human embryos? Read the rest of this entry »

Cybrids versus Organ Transplant (7)

thinker2

Cybrids have something in common with organ transplants. Organ transplant consists in the transferring of the body part of one individual (or cadaver) into another individual. Thus, be it skin graft or heart transplant, it all falls under organ transplant.

This also includes a peculiar case known a xeno-transplants, in which the donor is a member of a different species. In 1986, Baby Fae who was 2-weeks old, received the heart of a baboon that extended her life for 20 days.

While rejection problems continue to be the main obstacle in heart transplants, today pig’s heart valves are routinely transplanted into human hearts without raising any special ethical concern. No one spoke of Fae as someone who was 99.9 % human and 0.1 % baboon. Are we going to say that people living with pigs valves are part-human, part- porcine? That would be the same as saying that people with titanium heart valves would be part-humans, part-machine.

Read the rest of this entry »

Are cybrids good for Singapore? (5)

thinker2It seems that the creation of cybrids is a good economic investment. The question is: is it worth it? From what we know about this procedure, it looks extremely similar to the procedure that was used to create Dolly, the famous first cloned sheep. In other words, a human cybrid is a human clone in an animal egg. Does the fact that a human is cloned in an animal egg make it more or less ethical than cloning humans in human eggs?

On one hand, it seems that a created human-animal can be more easily disposed than an artificially created human. On the other hand, we cannot avoid thinking that there is something aberrant about the creation of what appears to be a half human, half animal creature. So, what are we doing? Are we advancing research or playing God? Read the rest of this entry »

Cloning humans in Singapore and calling them cybrids!(4)

thinker2.jpgThe last ethical frontier in Singapore is considering whether cloning humans in animal eggs is to be pursued.

As we should all know by now, the government wants a feedback response from the public regarding the creation of human “cybrids”, short form for “cytoplasmic hybrids”. In a nutshell, it means that they want to insert the human nucleus of a cell into an animal egg for it to develop into an animal-human embryo as a source of embryonic stem cells for the purpose of research.

Why they want to do that? Two reasons. Doing research with human embryonic stem cells presents two difficulties. Firstly, human eggs are not easily available. Secondly, creating fertilized human eggs with the nucleus of another human cell presents an ethical problem of cloning humans, which has been frowned upon by the UN. To kill two birds with one stone, scientists now want to use animals eggs. This will both solve the problem of scarcity of eggs while bypassing the ethical difficulties.

Since the purpose of creating these “cybrids” is not reproduction but experimentation, the human-animal embryo would be destroyed before the 14th day of development, avoiding thus even more ethical issues in case the embryos were viable.

So the question is, is the creation of “cybrids”, for the purpose of research, ethical?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.